Asset 9 transparent logo


Weighing the Risks: The Hazards of Labour Hire Businesses Compared to Direct Employment

In the Australian job market, labour hire businesses have gained popularity for their ability to provide flexible workforce solutions. These agencies offer companies a way to access skilled workers on a temporary basis, while also giving job seekers opportunities for various assignments. However, like any employment model, there are both dangers and benefits associated with using labour hire businesses over direct employment of staff.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released data    in late 2022 on this trend.  It reported key statistics as being:

    •   In June 2022, 319,900 people had a job in Labour supply services,

    • Employment in Labour supply services increased from 257,300 in June 2012 to 354,700 in March 2020.  This shrank slightly primarily due to Covid19.  There is an expectation that the figures will have rebounded by Q4 of 2023.

    • for 266,200 people, (83%) labour hire employment was their main source of income.

    • As of June 2022, 2.3% of all employed people across the Commonwealth of Australia had a job in Labour supply services.

    • 81% of labour hire workers worked full-time (August 2022).

    • 84% of labour hire workers did not have paid leave entitlements.

    • 18% of labour hire workers would prefer to work more hours (August 2022).

    • 61% of people in Labour supply services were men.

    • 27% of people in Labour supply services were classified as Labourers.

The important figure of 2.3% of the labour market indicates that labour hire employment represents an important sector of the economy in its own right.  The trend increase between 2012 And 2020 of almost 40% indicates that this sector is growing significantly.  It would be churlish not to expect that growth to continue.

However, beneath the allure of convenience, there are significant dangers associated with relying heavily on labour hire over direct employment. There remain risks faced by both employers and employees in the context of labour hire arrangements. By understanding the perils involved, businesses can make informed decisions about their hiring strategies and ensure the welfare of their workforce.

Workforce Flexibility:

Labour hire businesses provide companies with the agility to scale their workforce according to changing demands. This flexibility is particularly valuable for industries with seasonal fluctuations or project-based work, allowing employers to efficiently allocate resources without long-term commitments.

Job Insecurity and Uncertainty:

One of the most concerning aspects of labour hire for employees is the lack of job security. Temporary workers are often hired to fulfill short-term needs, leaving them vulnerable to sudden terminations once the assignment ends. This unpredictability can create financial stress, anxiety, and a constant need to seek new employment opportunities. In contrast, direct employees generally enjoy greater job stability, as they are part of the core workforce.


For short-term projects or specific tasks, hiring temporary workers through labour hire agencies can be cost-effective. Companies avoid long-term employee costs, such as benefits, training, and severance packages, while benefiting from skilled workers on an as-needed basis.

Access to Specialized Talent:

Labour hire businesses maintain extensive databases of skilled professionals across various industries. This grants employers access to a broader pool of talent, including niche expertise that might be challenging to find through traditional recruitment methods.

Diminished Benefits and Entitlements:

Labour hire employees often receive reduced benefits and entitlements compared to their direct counterparts. The absence of such benefits can result in dissatisfaction among temporary workers, leading to reduced motivation and productivity.

Limited Workplace Engagement:

Temporary employees may find it challenging to fully integrate into the company’s culture and values due to their transient nature. As a result, they might feel disconnected from the organization’s mission and objectives, hindering their ability to collaborate effectively with permanent staff. This lack of engagement can lead to inefficiencies, communication gaps, and a fragmented work environment.

Weakened Employer-Employee Relationships:

Labour hire businesses facilitate a less personal and invested relationship between employers and employees. With temporary workers continually rotating, companies may struggle to establish strong connections with their workforce, impacting loyalty, trust, and employee commitment. In contrast, direct employment fosters a deeper sense of belonging and loyalty to the organization.

Reduced Administrative Burden:

Outsourcing the hiring process to labour hire agencies can alleviate the administrative burden associated with recruiting, screening, and onboarding employees. The agencies handle these aspects, saving time and resources for the hiring company.

Trial Periods:

Temporary placements through labour hire agencies allow companies to assess potential employees’ suitability before making long-term commitments. This trial period can be advantageous in ensuring a good fit between the worker and the company culture.

Risk of Exploitation:

Temporary workers may be more susceptible to exploitation and unfair treatment due to their precarious position. Fear of job loss or lack of awareness about their rights can deter labour hire employees from voicing concerns regarding working conditions, pay rates, or health and safety issues. This creates an environment where exploitation can thrive, leading to potential wage theft and disregard for workers’ well-being.

Legal and Compliance Challenges:

Relying heavily on labour hire businesses can expose companies to legal and compliance risks. Different jurisdictions have specific regulations regarding temporary employees, including working hours, wages, and safety requirements. Failure to comply with these regulations can lead to financial penalties, reputational damage, and potential legal action.

In Australia, the labour hire industry has seen substantial growth in recent years, with numerous agencies providing a vast pool of skilled workers across different sectors. This growth has been driven by the need for workforce flexibility and cost management among businesses.

Governments recognises the potential dangers associated with labour hire and have introduced regulations to protect the rights of temporary workers. A number of jurisdictions including the ACT, Queensland, South Australia, and Victoria, have introduced scheme Labour Hire Licensing Act 2017 requiring labour hire providers to be licensed, ensuring compliance with fair work practices. There has been talk of a national scheme at federal government level.

In the Australian market, the use of labour hire businesses offers both benefits and dangers for employers and employees alike. While it provides workforce flexibility and access to specialized talent, job insecurity, limited benefits, and lower workplace engagement are significant concerns for temporary workers. On the other hand, direct employment offers job security, comprehensive benefits, and stronger employer-employee relationships, but it may lack the flexibility needed for certain industries.

Employers must carefully consider their hiring strategies and strike a balance between labour hire and direct employment to suit their specific needs. Ensuring compliance with labour laws and fostering an inclusive work environment are crucial for both models to protect the rights and well-being of all workers in the Australian job market.


Follow Us

Subscribe to our newsletter